However, I partially disagree because this only applies to Blackjack and not the other games.Ģ.) Diminish the Probability of Success for Progression SystemsĪ.) I would still think that the casino would want players to be making a -EV bet, which they all are, even at the cost of them successfully winning one betting unit more often.
I have heard many people opine as to the reason for this, and I disagree with all reasons except the first, and the reasons/disagreements will follow:Ī.) I agree with this one, because you don't want a BJ player to be spreading $5-$5000 depending on the favorability of the count. In short, I do not understand why the Table Maximum is not the same as the House Maximum for every Table with only the minimums differing, at least, not in limited circumstances.
I hope that someone can answer this for me, because I imagine the answer is something simple that I am missing.